Wrongful Convictions
EJI Wins an Order for Review of Alabama Death Penalty Case
May 31, 2010The Alabama Supreme Court recently granted EJI's request for review of Esau Jackson's capital murder conviction and death sentence. The case raises serious questions about whether Mr. Jackson was wrongfully convicted because the State presented improper evidence and argument.
Justice Stevens Says Risk of Wrongful Convictions and Sentences Is Increased in Death-Penalty Cases
May 9, 2010United States Supreme Court Associate Justice John Paul Stevens told a judicial conference audience that DNA testing has revealed that the risk of wrongfully convicting and sentencing an innocent person is increased in death-penalty cases.
Death Row Inmate Emanuel Gissendanner Wins New Trial After Questions Raised About His Guilt
April 30, 2010A Dale County Circuit Court has ordered a new trial for Emanuel Gissendanner because his trial lawyers' poor performance and the prosecution's failure to turn over evidence violated his constitutional rights. The ruling came after the same judge who presided over the original trial heard compelling testimony from alibi witnesses, forensic experts, and family members that raised questions about whether Mr. Gissendanner committed the capital murder for which he was sentenced to death.
Alabama Supreme Court Rules Death Row Prisoner's Claims of Juror Misconduct Must Be Heard
April 26, 2010On Friday, the Alabama Supreme Court held that death row inmate James Harrison has a right to have a judge consider his claim that jurors engaged in misconduct at his capital murder trial. The case was sent back to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing.
EJI Honors George Kendall and Thomas Sager and Celebrates the Release of Diane Jones
March 25, 2010
EJI staff with honoree Diane Jones, second from left.
On March 23, 2010, EJI honored George Kendall, Director of Squire, Sanders & Dempsey's Public Service Initiative, and Thomas Sager, general counsel of the DuPont Company and DuPont's legal department, with its Equal Justice Award. The second annual award event celebrated the triumph of Diane Jones, the first woman in Alabama to be released from Tutwiler Prison after being sentenced to life in prison without parole.
Alabama High Court Criticizes Judges' Common and Unfair Practice of Signing Orders Written by Prosecutors
March 19, 2010The Alabama Supreme Court on Friday reversed the summary denial of death row inmate Robert Ingram's postconviction petition because it could not be sure that the trial court's order - which was written by the prosecutor - actually reflected the court's independent findings and judgment.
EJI Wins Reversal for Death Row Client Jodey Waldrop
March 5, 2010On March 5, 2010, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals reversed Jodey Waldrop's conviction and death sentence, ruling that his jury improperly was allowed to consider highly prejudicial prior conviction evidence.
EJI Wins New Trial for Death Row Prisoner Thomas Lane
February 8, 2010The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals on February 5, 2010, reversed the capital murder conviction and death sentence imposed on Thomas Lane because he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
U.S. Supreme Court Orders Review of Judge-Jury Misconduct in Georgia Death Penalty Case
January 21, 2010The United States Supreme Court on January 19, 2010, issued a decision in Wellons v. Hall, a Georgia death-penalty case in which jurors gave the trial judge and bailiff sexually suggestive gifts during Mr. Wellons's trial for rape and murder. The Court wrote: "The disturbing facts of this case raise serious questions concerning the conduct of the trial, and this petition raises a serious question about whether the Court of Appeals carefully reviewed those facts before addressing petitioner's constitutional claims."
Based on Procedural Requirements, U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of Mentally Impaired Alabama Prisoner
January 20, 2010The United States Supreme Court today denied relief in Wood v. Allen, an Alabama case which asked the Court to address whether trial lawyers performed adequately when they failed to investigate and present evidence of mental retardation. The decision focused on the procedural rules that limit federal habeas corpus review and did not reach the merits of Mr. Woods's claim.

